www.artinamericamagazine.com/newsfeatures/magazine/more-life-the-work-of-damien-hirst
In an interview with
Tate director, Nicholas Serota, Hurst said that this was the most exciting piece he felt he
had ever made. (Searle, 2012) In the same Guardian review, Searle describes the
piece as ‘Clean and dirty, full of life and death, formally shocking and
rich, it has an air of maturity and finality’http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2012/apr/02/damien-hirst-tate-review
These contradictions and binary opposites are what I am trying to incorporate in my installation.
I have been considering adding maggots to my curiosity
cabinet to allow them to feed on sugar sprinkled onto a photographic kaleidoscope
of rotten meat, but that all seems a bit too obvious and clichéd having realised that
Hurst’s A Thousand Years was created
almost 24 years ago!!
I know that the use
of creative plagiarism is O.K in the art world and that every artist has been
inspired by previous work, but Hurst is so well known and 24 years is almost
too recent, but I am not sure if I can move forward with this idea. I was going
to use maggots, flies and possible spiders and other insects like cockroaches not to represent the life/ death cycle as in A Thousand Years but to comment on the
inevitability of decay and chaos not matter what we do to control and forestall
it. But I do not want people to look at my piece and say ‘Oh yes, Damian
Hurst’...
No comments:
Post a Comment